Never mind, grasshopper

September 15, 2008

Barack Obama’s idea of “neighborliness” is just the newest term for confiscate-and-redistribute liberal economics:

“If I am sitting pretty and you’ve got a waitress who is making minimum wage plus tips, and I can afford it and she can’t, what’s the big deal for me to say, I’m going to pay a little bit more? That’s neighborliness.” If that is Obama’s rationale for making the tax code even more steeply progressive than it already is, it’s no wonder voters are having second thoughts about his economic aptitude.

“Neighborliness.” Perhaps that word has a nonstandard meaning to someone whose home adjoined the property of convicted swindler Tony Rezko, but extracting money by force from someone who earned it in order to give it to someone who didn’t is not usually spoken of as neighborly. If Citizen Obama, “sitting pretty,” reaches into his own pocket and helps out the waitress with a large tip, he has shown a neighborly spirit. But there is nothing neighborly about using the tax code to compel someone else to pay the waitress that tip.

Taxation is not generosity, it is confiscation at gunpoint. Does Obama not understand the difference?

No, of course he doesn’t. None of them do, and they’re always trying to come up with a different word to disguise what they’re really all about. They’re not really “liberal,” they’re “progressive,” and now Obama has hit on “neighborly.” At an editorial writers’ conference a few years ago, my colleagues were beside themselves with joy because they had come up with “communitarian,” as if there were no difference between all of us getting together to build a barn for one of us and taking money from all of us to provide for those who never bothered to try. If you grew up believing in Aesop’s tale of the foolish grasshopper who perished because he frittered away his summer, unlike the ants who worked diligently to prepare for winter, then grow up. The ants are the idiots.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “Never mind, grasshopper”

  1. Doug Says:

    Aesop’s tale about the ant and the grasshoppers as amended for modern times would have the grasshopper inheriting the anthill from his daddy, then the hardworking ants would have given most of the fruits of their labor to the grasshopper as rent; leaving the grasshopper to enjoy the winter in the sunny Caribbean while the ants eked out a living during the winter.

    Moral of the story: Hourly work is for chumps.

  2. Bob G. Says:

    Doug:
    I’m suprised you didn’t include the part about the corrupt UNION the ants were members of…or the city the ants lived in that was busy fleecing the ants while building a new downtown BEEHIVE…!

    😉

    B.G.

  3. Doug Says:

    Hehe. Either way, the ants are chumps.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: